Legion Forums

Legion Forums (http://www.legionhq.org/index2.php)
-   The Colosseum (http://www.legionhq.org/forumdisplay.php?f=2)
-   -   Wc3 (http://www.legionhq.org/showthread.php?t=3658)

Zhukov 02-07-2003 20:45

Wc3
 
I tried out WC3 multiplayer on LAN with some mates.

And it was crap! :(

TeHaR 02-07-2003 22:21

u cant go in the deap of war3 within some hours on a lan trust me :yes:

SLavin 03-07-2003 01:56

lol zhukov u big n00bie :P tsk tsk

MadeMan 03-07-2003 12:09

u might need to play it a couple of times :)

Slayer 04-07-2003 14:43

Frozen Throne
 
Well, im playin right now the new expansion, FT, and im amazed by the new high-quality graphics, and the wonderful new characters ^^. I,ve just stopped some moments to relax after an hard quest (I aways play single play on HARD Difficulty) and i have some doubts of the balance of the Bnet with this new features... Well, after i finish this campaign, ill try Bnet to see what changed...

[M7] 04-07-2003 19:50

Re: Wc3
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Zhukov
I tried out WC3 multiplayer on LAN with some mates.
And it was crap! :(

War3 has a pretty unique gameplay concerning heroes (leveling them etc.) and the general low count of unit (every unit and every bit of gold really counts).

Most of this can be pretty much ignored in singleplayer, but is absolutely crucial in Muliplayer.

Read this and try again.
(and yes, a serious Wc3 game is stressing and quite a bit of mental strain if you have a worthy opponent :) )

Link 05-07-2003 13:25

at the start I thought wcIII was mega crap, but I actually enjoy it now

Blyr 05-07-2003 17:49

i still hate wc3. i think i'm going to sell it.

Xerxes 10-07-2003 16:09

heh, WarCraft > all ... no matter wich of them ;)

hkp 11-07-2003 14:39

wc3 single player sucks big time imo. But the multiplayer never gets dull due to the huge amount of tactics and different styles of play on bnet.

Zhukov 15-07-2003 12:30

wc3 multiplayer is crap, couse its so easy to just lay back and defend.. (2 normal towers + 4 cannon towers heh)

[M7] 15-07-2003 15:44

Quote:

Originally posted by Zhukov
wc3 multiplayer is crap, couse its so easy to just lay back and defend.. (2 normal towers + 4 cannon towers heh)
Turtling = sure death, if your opponent has 3 working braincells... thats one point where WC3 is superior to Starcraft imho.

Aesop 15-07-2003 16:10

Tbh starcraft also doesn't work with turtling, at least as long as you don't play BGH maps (*shudder*). Basically, on more than comp-stomp level of play, you will have quite dynamic and dramatic matches in both games.

whoop 15-07-2003 18:10

new on the forums, old pa player.

definitely interested in wc3.

anyone looking for someone to AT with or just shoot the breeze, feel free to drop me a PM.

-whoop

Integral 15-07-2003 23:54

Warcraft 3 is a great game.

Xenius 16-07-2003 04:41

Re: Wc3
 
Quote:

Originally posted by Zhukov
I tried out WC3 multiplayer on LAN with some mates.

And it was crap! :(


fs war3 OWN.... atleast the Frozen Throne.. .its good..
if u dont like it... play DoM wiht ]x[

Zhukov 18-07-2003 17:55

wtf is turtling???

Zhukov, the wc3 n00b

whoop 18-07-2003 19:23

turtling is when you spend all your money on static defences, in the vain hope that you will surve an attack by an opponent who has spent his resources on attack units.

This is a horrible mistake, mainly because your options for composition are infinite with troops, but almost non-existent with static defence units.

Compare with "pds whore".

-whoop


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:43.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.